Tolstoy’s Hadji Murad

Hadji MuradLeo Tolstoy’s Hadji Murad begins with this now very familiar device of the unnamed first-person narrator who vanishes, replaced in the rest of the text by an omniscient one, after the story’s premises are introduced.*

On his way home, the narrator came across this beautiful  thistle plant called “Tartar,” which he plucks with great difficulty: a metaphor for the Russians’ campaign against the Chechens and the story that follows.

Not only did the stalk prick on every side – even through the handkerchief I wrapped around my hand – but it was so tough that I had to struggle with it for nearly five minutes, breaking the fibres one by one…

‘But what energy and tenacity! With what what determination it defended itself, and how dearly it sold its life!’

The short novel over a hundred pages revolves around Hadji Murad, a Chechen general who arranged his surrender to the colonizing Russians after earning the ire of his warlord, the imam Shamil. Hadji Murad stays with the Russians in their garrisons with plans to use them to help him in his power struggle against Shamil.

But Hadji Murad’s enemy holds his family captive. Fearing for their life, he escapes from the Russians in a daring plan to save his family himself. Suspicious that Hadji Murad has been playing with them all along, the Russians pursues him. Surrounded on all sides, he makes a last stand.

In Hadji Murad, Tolstoy devotes much effort to show the conflict from the perspectives of all its participants in intricately woven scenes.

The artificial civility of the Russian officials and aristocrats who entertain Hadji Murad, with their parties, cards, champagne, and coquettish wives, are contrasted to the stoic air of a Chechen household with its severe religiosity and bound women.

Meanwhile, the cynicism and blind megalomania of Czar Nicholas I who gave decisions out of whim is contrasted to the ruthlessness of the Chechen warlord Shamil whose orders were not only enforced according to the Sharia but also for instrumentalist considerations.

The caprice of the Russian nobles is contrasted to the sad fate of those who serve under them with the death of a poor but hardworking peasant soldier in battle. He was sent to the Caucasus over a lazy brother who was kept out of conscription by their clan because because of his many children.

While Tolstoy finished writing Hadji Murad in 1904, the events described in it was supposed to have happened in 1851. However, one is given a sense that the story may as well have been set today.

Apart from good storytelling and vivid details, we also get insights into the war in general and historical conflict in the Caucasus, a conflict that has flared again of late.

We see the beginnings of modern counterinsurgency tactics in the Russian’s burning of enemy villages and agricultural fields as well as the felling of forests and the erecting of a system of forts designed to constrict the movement of the Chechens.

As in War and Peace, Tolstoy shows the gap between appearances and reality in war:

Though all of them – and especially those who had been in action – knew and could not help knowing that in those days in the Caucasus, and in fact anywhere and at any time, such hand-to-hand hacking as is always imagined and described never occurs (or if hacking with swords and bayonets ever does occur, it is only those who are running away that get hacked)… p. 24

With all the new literature coming out all the time, it gets more difficult to choose which ones to read. More often than not, an old-fashioned realistic story from Tolstoy with a narrative that still resonates a hundred years after it was written is never a disappointing a choice. ■

* In this case, the first-narrator reappears briefly at the very end.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Tolstoy’s Hadji Murad

  1. Hello Karlo Mikhail. I have to write an essay about the book, can you please help me? please. if you can email me a replay to hamham_x1@hotmail.com, what you wrote here had helped me alot, but there is a specific subject i need to write about.

    • hello, i’m very sorry for the late reply. i rarely check up on this blog, at least not every day or every other day. a long passage near the story’s conclusion, the part when Hadji Murad related parts of his life to his Russian hosts. his being with Shamil is a marriage of convenience. at first, he didn’t join Shamil against the Russians because Shamil had the blood of his brother and a close colleague. To make the long story short, it was only after the imperial authorities went after him that he went over to Shamil after the latter promised to help him against a common foe.

      “There never was any friendship between me and Shamil,” said Hadji Murad at the end of the story, ‘but he feared me and needed me. But it so happened that I was asked who should be Imam after Shamil, and I replied: “He will be Imam whose sword is sharpest!”

      “This was told to Shamil and he wanted to get rid of me. He sent me into Tabasaran. I went, and captured a thousand sheep and three hundred horses, but he said I had not done the right thing and dismissed me from being Naib, and ordered me to send him all the money. I sent him a thousand gold pieces. He sent his murids and they took from me all my property. He demanded that I should go to him, but I knew he wanted to kill me and I did not go. Then he sent to take me. I resisted and went over to Vorontsov…”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s